Tuesday, January 16, 2007

My Missionaries

Conversing with his elder sister, he mentioned that his doctor had told him, last evening, he would not live the night through; ‘but, (he observed), ‘I did not think so. I could not speak, to tell him that I entertained a different opinion, but I felt a certainty, in my own mind, that my end was not near. Indeed, I had a firm and abiding conviction, that I had a great deal of work to do, before my heavenly father called me home.’ When asked, what made him think so? He replied, ‘From a constant whispering to my heart, “Be up and doing.”'

--William Burchell on Thomas Burchell, Jamaica missionary

My M.A. thesis is a comparative study of missions in the British Empire. I'm looking specifically at how "the colonial encounter," as we history types like to say, shaped missionary identities and loyalties in Bengal and in Jamaica in the first half of the nineteenth century. Part of my thesis argues against a scholar named Catherine Hall, who has written a great deal on constructions of Englishness and masculinity--power relationships, essentially--in the Empire. She argues, in several places, that Baptist missionaries in Jamaica imposed middle class Englishness upon their converts in a successful effort to assert their power, as white men, over former slaves. She especially notes their usage of terms such as "babes in Christ" and "younger brothers and sisters" to describe African converts. I, in turn, note that these terms (and many other missionary actions) actually come from scripture or are grounded in biblical primitivism or apostolic example (which the missionaries themselves often refer to in their own writing. Prof. Hall didn't notice that, I guess). Too, my interpretation accords more agency to native Christians than Hall's allows.

I've really enjoyed researching and writing it. I plan to expand it, with more research--I need more secular sources--into the dissertation, which will eventually be publishable, I hope. Someone needs to straighten out Catherine Hall and vindicate those missionaries.

While researching this, I've read several thousand pages of missionary journals and accounts from between 1790 and 1850. The immersion in these old writings--just the beauty of the language--has probably been my favorite part. I've also been fortunate enough to handle several nineteenth century books. None were in their original bindings, but the pages were original, yellow-gold and wispy, and some had frontispiece portraits of the subject, with a signature, like yrs affectionately...William Knibb. It has also been very interesting to see how these men thought about God and how he works his will in the world, and to compare their ideas to mine. Sometimes reading of their faith and fervor, and their ability to work tirelessly for souls, has shamed me. I also often found myself wondering at their certainty of purpose. Often, they doubted themselves and their own abilities, but they never doubted God, and they were not cynical. I am probably too close to my subject by now, as some of their words and phrases and philosophy have crept into my sentences. I fear I am still cynical, but these missionaries have improved me, indeed.

9 Comments:

At 1/17/07, 12:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just what I was looking for. Thank you.

 
At 1/17/07, 1:13 PM, Blogger Jonathan G. Reinhardt said...

Sounds good.

Question, though. Does the fact that certain terms/acts are biblical or based on apostolic example preclude that they also advance a certain Western power structure? That is to say, can the missionaries be agents of their own privileging without explicitly or willfully intending to be? Just asking. I've lived with some very serious missionaries in Third World countries, and there's certainly a cultural interpretation to their gospel, inadvertently, that prefers their own lifestyle (work ethic, for example) over the native one on "biblical" grounds.

 
At 1/17/07, 9:59 PM, Blogger Kelly said...

Of course, I am not arguing that these Baptist missionaries' actions or the churches they founded were purely apostolic. That would be as quaint as a CoC with a cornerstone that says "Founded A.D. 33." I've never come across a nineteenth century Englishman without a few hegemonic tendencies, though these men saw empire as a Providential opportunity for soul-saving, rather than a chance for profit. I allow, in my work, that the missionary enterprise was always accompanied by a "civilizing mission" that was strongly informed by British culture and practice.

I believe that the difference between my argument and Hall's lies in our understanding of the missionaries' worldview. (I have been somewhat influenced by Monte Cox in my approach to this, as you might imagine.) She sees their primary identity as English, white, male, and middle class. I argue instead that they saw themselves first as Christians--Dissenters, specifically, and of working class background. In the colonial setting, their backgrounds--already deviant from mainstream Englishness--led them to identify more with their converts (be they African or Bengali) than with the often debauched and hostile white populations they saw around them. This led to radical implications for colonial churches, and ultimately helped undermine imperial power. In India, for example, Christian missionaries were among the founders of the Indian National Congress.

Incidentally, the number of clear references to "apostolic example" in these missionary texts is astounding. One of my favorite examples is from Bengal, where most converts had been born with names that praised Hindu deities. The Baptist missionaries decided not to ask converts to change their names "because it did not appear to have been usual in apostolic times to change the names of such heathen origin as Sylvanus, Hermes, and Fortunatus."

Unrelated to thesis: Today we checked our P.O. box for the first time since getting back from break, and had Christmas cards from Jonathan, Everett and Melody, some family people, and an engagement picture from Nate and Kristen. Christmas in January! Thanks all around. I've put a lot of pictures from E&M's lovely beachy wedding up, and we are saving the mulled wine spice for a special occasion.

 
At 1/22/07, 9:42 AM, Blogger Kelly said...

I'm not sure whether my response to Jonathan is showing up...I can see it, but it still says only 2 comments.

 
At 1/22/07, 12:49 PM, Blogger Jonathan G. Reinhardt said...

It's showing up and wowing us.

 
At 1/22/07, 11:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kelly, your response is just what I needed. Thanks for taking the time to clarify your position. It was great seeing you guys at the wedding.

 
At 1/23/07, 1:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey all,
I was in New York over the weekend and got to see some mutual friends of this group, including dear old Melson, who is trucking along nicely in his grad program.

Also, Jesse's mom is having her surgery today for breast cancer in Little Rock, so please keep her in your prayers.

 
At 1/23/07, 4:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kelly, are you familiar with William Dalrymple? If so, what do you think of his stuff? I've read two of his books on the middle east, and I just picked up "City of Djinns" about Delhi.

 
At 1/24/07, 10:13 PM, Blogger Kelly said...

T-lor, I have not read any of his work. As far as can tell, he is a travel writer who transitioned to popular historian and thus, not someone we read in grad classes. I should pick one up and give you an educated opinion, though. The Last Mughal, which professes to be a scholarly work, looks particularly interesting.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home